Evaluation criteria for the final evaluation of the assistant professorship of Taiwan Studies
1) Research achievements following the doctoral thesis
a) Completion of a monograph (or individual publications which overall are the equivalent of the scope and research output of a second monograph). This work must be proof that the author has conducted comprehensive research in at least one further thematic field in this subject or discipline in addition to that dealt with in the doctoral thesis.
b) Further publications, at least one of which must be on a topic that differs from the topic of the monograph and the doctoral thesis.
For the interim evaluation: Proof (via publications/manuscript chapters/work plans) that the required final qualification is likely to be achieved in the period in question.
2) Teaching across the full spectrum of the advertised position
Above-average teaching assessments. It is expected that, by the end of the assistant professorship, the spectrum of classes taught (lectures, seminars, exercises/ practical work, participation in assessment) will have covered the breadth of requirements of the advertised professorship.
For the interim evaluation: Above-average teaching assessments. Proof that new fields of teaching have been added.
3) Independent third-party funding initiatives (extramural)
Approved independent application for third-party funding. Independence in this context means: As the sole responsible or chiefly responsible member of a project or subproject, i.e. not, e.g., a member of a joint project or subproject with a more experienced or equally experienced project manager within the University. Joint projects with representatives of other universities are possible. Extramural in this case means: External third-party funding in which internal assessment processes do not play a role.
Third-party funding may include not only research projects with funded positions, but also: Successfully obtaining a research scholarship or similar, which within the frame-work of an assistant professorship may lead to a leave of absence without pay; third-party payments for guest professorships or similar; third-party funding for large conferences. We expect serious applications whose quality can be assessed; in the event that unfortunate circumstances mean that all applications are rejected, this does not automatically mean that this evaluation criterium has not been met.
For the interim evaluation: at least one existing application or concrete plan for application
4) National and international cooperation effort
The establishment of national and international collaborations must be demonstrated, e.g. through the applicant’s lecture activities, participation in and organization of conferences, conclusion of new MoUs, conclusion of and active participation in Erasmus agreements, etc.
For the interim evaluation: Evidence of such cooperation, for the final evaluation: Evidence of sustained activity in this area
5) Supervision of academic theses within the regular framework of the subject
Supervision of BA and MA theses within the existing degree programs in Sinology/ Chinese Studies. Responsibility for the task of first supervisor of a doctoral process need only be proven if the applicant, as an assistant professor, is responsible for a doctoral researcher; this doctoral process must be completed in a foreseeable time period. Otherwise, participation in doctoral supervision (examiner's report, doctoral colloquium, second supervisor) is sufficient.
For the interim evaluation: No definition possible at this point due to the current lack of a major degree program.
6) Successful independent work in committees and administration Proof of the ability to represent the interests of the subject in university contexts.
The applicant must show that she/he has the ability to successfully carry out tasks in this area independently and on her/his own responsibility. It is not sufficient to merely be a member of committees.
For the interim evaluation: Evidence of work in an area or concrete plans.
7) Proven collaboration with other researchers in the context of specific research projects
e.g. intensive and equal cooperation in the planning of a publication or as part of a research project, in particular interdisciplinary cooperation.
For the interim evaluation: no concrete evidence necessary at this stage.
8) Evidence of transfer activities into society
Evidence to be provided e.g. by at least 1 publication for a wider audience, lectures or events with a wider public audience, participation in discussions on subject definitions or the role of the humanities or similar.
For the interim evaluation: Evidence of work in one of these areas or concrete plans for it.
All criteria must be met. Criteria 3, 4, 6 and 7 have been met, however, if the applicant has carried out independent, successful work in the area and more may be expected to follow. Activities above and beyond the requirements in these areas are not expected; nor can they be used to compensate a lesser performance under criteria 1 and 2 under any circumstances. Broader activity is expected under criteria 2 and 5. The department is responsible for ensuring that the applicant has enough time available for her/his own research work (criterion 1).